(An item from ISHN Member information service) We have been following articles that discuss behavioural intentions and this latest one indicates that the transparency of BI research may need improvement. An article in the November 2012 issue of Addictions reports on an analysis of BI research studies and " used the Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Nonrandomized Designs (TREND) Statement to develop the 59-question Adapted TREND Questionnaire (ATQ). Each ATQ question corresponds to a transparency guideline and asks how clearly a study reports its objectives, research design, analytical methods and conclusions". The authors noted that "The average report adhered to 38.4 (65.1%) of the 59 ATQ transparency guidelines. Each of the 59 ATQ questions received positive responses from an average of 16.9 (63.8%) of the reports." They conclude that " Gambling intervention reports need to improve their transparency by adhering to currently neglected and particularly relevant guidelines. Among them are recommendations for comparing study participants who are lost to follow-up and those who are retained, comparing study participants with the target population, describing methods used to minimize potential bias due to group assignment, and reporting adverse events or unintended effects." Given the potential challenges associated with BI and its importance as a tool for school health studies, where behavioural outcomes are expensive to track for more than a few months after the intervention, this article appears very relevant. Read more.
0 Comments
(An item taken from the daily/weekly/monthly ISHN Member information service) As with many other behaviours, healthy eating is a social construction that is built differently by different people. As we design education and information campaigns, we need to address those different understandings and perceptions. An article in Issue #4, 2012 of the Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior draws from several qualittative research sources to describe how people perceive and act upon the idea of healthy eating. The researchers found studies emphasized a social constructionist approach, and most used focus groups and/or individual, in-depth interviews to collect data. Study participants explained healthy eating in terms of food, food components, food production methods, physical outcomes, psychosocial outcomes, standards, personal goals, and as requiring restriction. Researchers described meanings as specific to life stages and different life experiences, such as parenting and disease onset. Identity (self-concept), social settings, resources, food availability, and conflicting considerations were themes in participants’ explanations for not eating according to their ideals for healthy eating. The researchers noted that the implications of these findings are that people interpret healthy eating in complex and diverse ways that reflect their personal, social, and cultural experiences, as well as their environments. Their meanings include but are broader than the food composition and health outcomes considered by scientists. The rich descriptions and concepts generated by qualitative research can help practitioners and researchers think beyond their own experiences and be open to audience members’ perspectives as they seek to promote healthy ways of eating. Read more..
|
Welcome to our
|